Suchergebnisse

The article is focused on the comprehensive study of methodological principles and practical aspects of the implementation of organizational means for the realization of state anti-corruption policy in Ukraine. The author has considered the main features of organizational and legal measures within public administration; has analyzed the main organizational means of ensuring counteraction to corruption within the public and power sphere. It has been stressed that the necessary prerequisite for the effective implementation of anti-corruption policy of the state is the proper provision of anti-corruption activities of the authorized subjects of combating corruption through the system of organizational means and legal guarantees. The author has distinguished the two broadest groups of organizational means and guarantees of anti-corruption policy implementation – general and special. The general include the following means and guarantees that are common to the whole process of public administration and the functioning of public authority in the whole, and the special – are those provided by the anti-corruption legislation to ensure the professional activities of the subjects of combating corruption taking into account the object, tasks and the objective of counteraction to corruption On the basis of the conducted analysis, the author has made certain conclusions: a) democracy occupies the central place among general organizational means and guarantees of the proper implementation of state anti-corruption policy; b) we should understand the result compared to the expenses for its achievement as organizational effectiveness of the implementation of anti-corruption policy in a democratic state; c) to ensure an adequate level of conducting anti-corruption expertise of regulatory acts of Ukraine, it is necessary to form an independent collegial agency – the National Commission of Anti-corruption Experts. At the same time the status of such an agency should be determined by a special law, and its chairman should be elected by the commission itself from among its members. ; Досліджено методологічні засади і практичні аспекти застосування організаційних засобів реалізації державної антикорупційної політики в Україні. Розглянуто основні ознаки організаційно-правових заходів у державному управлінні, проаналізовано основні організаційні засоби забезпечення протидії корупції в публічно-владній сфері. Застосовано системний підхід до аналізу організації процесу реалізації антикорупційної політики як ключового функціонального напряму публічного адміністрування в сучасній правовій державі. Сформульовано пропозиції щодо подальшого реформування уповноважених суб'єктів протидії корупції.

It has been stressed that at the present stage anti-corruption policy of the state is characterized by certain isolation from other spheres of executive and administrative activity. That is, the authorities act only in certain areas, which are mainly related to the elimination of the effects of corruption, while most foreign countries focus attention on prevention – the impact on the factors leading to the emergence of corruption. In this sense, domestic anti-corruption policy needs a substantial re-thinking. The purpose of the article became theoretical and legal study of international experience in the implementation of anti-corruption policy in such countries as the Netherlands, Finland, USA, Japan, South Korea, Georgia, as well as studying the possibilities of its use in Ukraine. Authors have analyzed organizational structure of specialized anti-corruption institutions, legislation of these countries and methods of implementation of anti-corruption policy. Conclusions regarding the directions and scope of the use of international experience in the implementation of anti-corruption policy in Ukraine have been made. In particular, authors prove that Ukraine while formulating and implementing anti-corruption policy, should focus on: the harmonious combination of coercive and incentive measures; introduction of inter-institutional models for the detection, prevention and combating corruption; balancing state and public interests in the implementation of anti-corruption measures; raising the legal culture and citizens' legal awareness through anti-corruption propaganda and reforming education; creation of the conditions for impossibility of legalization of incomes obtained through the commission of corruption offenses; systematic nature in reforming state power and minimization of direct contacts between citizens and state officials. It has been also found out that an important role in the foreign practice of anti-corruption policy implementation plays the combination of organizational (creation of special anti-corruption structures), legal (legislative definition of the principles and mechanisms of combating corruption) and information (ensuring transparency of public administration) aspects. It is the complexity of these aspects that ensures the effectiveness of anti-corruption policy of the state. It has been determined that in the majority of foreign countries, which experience in preventing and combating corruption is positive, the political will of the authorities and the interaction of the authorities and civil society institutions in the prevention and counteraction of corruption play a decisive role. ; Досліджено позитивний досвід реалізації антикорупційної політики в таких зарубіжних державах, як Нідерланди, Фінляндія, США, Японія, Південна Корея, Грузія, а також можливість його використання в Україні. Проаналізовано організаційну структуру спеціалізованих антикорупційних інституцій, законодавство цих країн та методи реалізації політики у сфері протидії корупції. Зроблено висновки щодо напрямків та обсягу використання зарубіжного досвіду реалізації антикорупційної політики в Україні.